Topic: cannabis

That we have such a large and growing community of frequent users is a tribute not to evidence, but to hype.

Cannabis doesn’t replace opioids the way methadone or buprenorphine do. There’s no antagonist effect as with naloxone or naltrexone.

The best answer is the one we came up with to explain the selectivity of alcoholism: Differences in individual susceptibility.

There’s not a lot of disagreement about the potential for cannabis intoxication to impair driving performance, though without an accepted standard and a reliable roadside test, it’s not of much value in a courtroom.

…despite the rapid growth in new cases, the number still doesn’t equal alcohol.

Unbeknownst to the patient, the CBD products they also use could affect how well those prescribed medicines work, or interact with them in unhelpful ways.

It’s likely that certain individuals are vulnerable to psychosis, and experts may point to a family history of mental illness.

I think the problem is I have read the research, and it didn’t confirm the claims made on its behalf.

Now, with legalization, “cannabusiness” is being commercialized along the lines of alcohol and tobacco.

When businesses are failing, they’ll try anything to earn back some of their investment.