Topic: epidemiology

The list of deaths from the practice is long and oddly prestigious, featuring celebs such as John Belushi and Chris Farley, among many others.

It’s as if we can’t conceive of life without drowning ourselves in abusable substances.

We focus on the drug, as if someone who uses heroin, for instance, can’t also have a problem with alcohol, or sleeping pills, or methamphetamine, or this new, more potent form of marijuana that’s showing up everywhere.

It’s still just nicotine, after all, even if someone doctored it to smell like creme brulee.

Not Latin American cartels or Afghan warlords, but advocates for opioid treatment of chronic pain, and pharmaceutical firms with a substantial financial interest in selling opioids.

Still, if the epidemic is already 28 years old, then how much more effective would these steps have been if they had been initiated way back when?

…if the ground is now shifting to other drugs, then what are we doing in response to that?

I don’t think there are any health benefits associated with the practice; it’s purely about getting high.

Naturally, high-energy entrepreneurs are attracted to stimulants. At least until they begin to experience the toxicity associated with too much of a good thing.

Once such substances get a foothold in a region, they’re extremely hard to eradicate.